Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Audra Lynn

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Audra Lynn[edit]

Audra Lynn was proposed for deletion. This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record. The result of the debate was was a consensus to keep the article.

Not notable. Last year's Playboy "Miss October" whose entire TV filmography is one appearace on "Family Feud" (related to her Playboy appearance), and one Frasier episode as an unnamed character. 6,000 hits isn't very impressive for someone who's had nude pictures available for at least a year--compare to "Yamila Diaz-Rahi"'s 40,000 hits, with no nudes (at least that I'm aware of), although she has been in a couple Sports Illustrated swimsuit editions. Niteowlneils 02:26, 23 Oct 2004 (UTC)

  • Delete: Not a speedy delete candidate, but not at all a person who has done enough to discuss, and discussion is what articles are. Then there was the bit that she's a Republican. If only she were the only one, it would be something to talk about. Geogre 03:50, 23 Oct 2004 (UTC)
  • Delete. Non-notable nude model. Gwalla | Talk 03:09, 24 Oct 2004 (UTC)
  • Keep. Playboy Playmates are notable enough and completely verifiable - David Gerard 07:29, 24 Oct 2004 (UTC)
  • Delete: pr0ncruft. Wile E. Heresiarch 23:07, 24 Oct 2004 (UTC)
  • Keep. Notable and verifiable. The article could use expansion, though, so I've marked it as a stub. Factitious 08:58, Oct 25, 2004 (UTC)
  • Delete. Indrian 17:28, Oct 26, 2004 (UTC)
  • Keep. Very much potential to become enyclopedic siroχo 00:52, Oct 27, 2004 (UTC)
  • keep, notable. Posiduck 03:42, 27 Oct 2004 (UTC)
  • Keep. I don't think the Wikimedia servers are running out of disk space. --Tmh 10:04, 27 Oct 2004 (UTC)
Maybe not, but there's also the issue of bandwidth. I, for one, am tired of it taking, at times, 2 to 5 minutes to load a Wikipedia page. Also FWIW, I am a Playboy subscriber, so hardly anti-porn, but I don't find these women encyclopedic--any woman with lucky genes, and/or a good plastic surgeon, being willing to be photographed nekkid can qualify--no skill, knowledge, or ability required. Niteowlneils 17:48, 27 Oct 2004 (UTC)
That is one of the more specious arguements I've seen in a while. Bandwidth is not a problem unless all the people are trying to view this article. If they are trying to view it then that simply argues against you since the article would be then be very much notible / in demand. --ShaunMacPherson 19:18, 27 Oct 2004 (UTC)
It should be further noted that a deleted article takes up as much space as a kept one. anthony 警告 01:12, 28 Oct 2004 (UTC)
  • Keep. Playboy's Miss October. anthony 警告 13:59, 27 Oct 2004 (UTC)
  • Keep. Mmmmmm, October. Radman1 16:03, 27 Oct 2004 (UTC)
  • Keep, obviously notable. Sam [Spade] 18:51, 27 Oct 2004 (UTC)
  • Keep Give the article time to grow. It is a significant topic. --ShaunMacPherson 19:18, 27 Oct 2004 (UTC)
  • Keep. A Playboy Playmate of the Month is relatively notable, though certainly one would have to stop short of including every Playboy model ever. Also, I'd say that the reason that her Google hits are lower than those of Ms. Diaz-Rahi are because Ms. Lynn's had less time to get her pictures uploaded, downloaded and redistributed by pr0n pirates. -Sean Curtin 00:44, Oct 28, 2004 (UTC)
  • What a great idea! I started a List of every Playboy model ever. To slow the deluge of pictures articles, I only linked the ones who already have an entry, so the less famous ones won't suddenly become an article in need of creation. Oh, and keep The Steve 14:09, Oct 28, 2004 (UTC)
  • Keep. Playmate of the Month equals notability. (Yeah, whatever, inclusionists, I said the dreaded 'n' word. So sue me.) Johnleemk | Talk 11:43, 28 Oct 2004 (UTC)
  • Keep. We have an article on Playboy, and Playboy magazine would be nothing without the centerfold models. I think we can afford the space for one new article each month. If we can keep Bajoran wormhole I think we can keep an article on a real person.Pedant 17:43, 2004 Oct 28 (UTC)
  • Keep. Model of the month is notable enough. -- [[User:Solitude|Solitude\talk]] 10:08, Oct 29, 2004 (UTC)
  • KEEP Playmates are notable. --The_stuart 22:33, 31 Oct 2004 (UTC)

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like other '/delete' pages is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion or on the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.